Gay Head Lighthouse listed to 2013 11 Most Endangered Places

photo by: Gay Head Lighthouse | Martha's Vineyard Museum

Section 106 Under Threat

The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) is advancing a sweeping and damaging proposal to rewrite the regulations for Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). If implemented, these new rules would dramatically diminish the effectiveness of the NHPA and the current legal protections for historic and cultural places.

Since the enactment of NHPA 60 years ago, Section 106 has been the foundational requirement for federal agencies to “take into account” the effects of their actions on historic properties and places, enabling public participation and comment in the process, empowering state and local governments and Tribal communities to have a voice in the process, and often improving the project and enhancing the outcome.

These new regulations will lead to more delays and more litigation as federal agencies and applicants try to navigate compliance without the well-known and well-used consultation process, which often leads to negotiated win-win outcomes. The preservation community and our partners across the country are mobilizing to fight this harmful proposal.

“The ACHP’s proposed changes to Section 106 will eviscerate the preservation of our shared civic and cultural heritage in the United States.”

Brent Leggs, President and CEO of the National Trust for Historic Preservation

Your To Do List

Your insights and stories help make the case for why preservation matters not just to history but to the future we share. In recognition and celebration of our nation’s 250 years—we are setting an ambitious goal of sending 250,000 letters to our elected officials. Join us in this effort.

  1. View the recording of the webinar we hosted on Thursday, July 30, discussing these devastating changes. | Download the slides (PDF)
  2. Write to your governor to share how these changes impact historic properties in your location.
  3. Write to your members of Congress and consider contacting the district office during the August recess to make your voice heard.
  4. Send us examples of Section 106 consultations that benefited your community.
  5. Be prepared to send comments to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation when the comment period opens.

Resources

To stay informed on the latest developments, including action alerts, sign up for emails, and follow us on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Threads.

Webinar Recording

Webinar: Section 106 Regulations Under Threat

This July 30 webinar covered potential impacts of the proposed changes to Section 106 regulations, provided information about next steps and the timeline for the process, and what you can do to push back against this threat to the work of historic preservation.

Some of the most disturbing aspects of the proposed changes include:

  • Federal agencies will no longer be required to try to avoid or minimize damage to America’s historic architecture, neighborhoods, and landscapes.
  • State and local governments will no longer have the right to be notified or have the opportunity to comment when federal agencies propose to damage or destroy historic places within their jurisdiction.
  • The public’s opportunity to comment on federal historic preservation policies or actions would now be entirely optional, at the discretion of the federal agency.
  • The federal government will no longer be required to consult with Tribal communities or seek their expertise regarding their own significant cultural resources.
  • Significant cultural landscape features would no longer be considered historic properties, so federal agencies would no longer be required to take into account any adverse effects to significant places such as the Grand Canyon.
  • Federal agencies would no longer be required to consider the reasonably foreseeable consequences of their actions on historic properties, other than direct actions that physically damage the properties.
  • These regulations are inconsistent with the National Historic Preservation Act and would violate the Council’s own rules and procedures.
  • The proposed changes are also internally inconsistent and riddled with errors, likely to cause enormous regulatory confusion and chaos.

Download our one-pager on this critical threat.

Download

Updates

  1. Video: Section 106 Regulations Under Threat
  2. Statement on ACHP Proposed Revisions to Section 106 of NHPA