Photographer Jason Reblando had been documenting public housing units in the Chicago area when he learned about an intriguing but little-known phenomenon in American history: three “Greenbelt Towns” that were planned, built, and managed by the federal government in the late 1930s as part of the New Deal.

Reblando was intrigued by the history and visual appeal of these three cities—Greenbelt, Maryland; Greenhills, Ohio; and Greendale, Wisconsin—and photographed and researched the communities’ history and current landscape for his 2017 book New Deal Utopias.

We spoke recently with Reblando about the project, as well as the unique history behind these three “Greenbelt Towns." The following is an abbreviated version of the conversation, along with a selection of Reblando’s photographs from the book.

What is the story behind the creation of these three “Greenbelt Towns” during the 1930s?

The Greenbelt program was a New Deal program that was created by the Resettlement Administration, the R.A., and it was headed by Rexford Tugwell who was one of FDR’s right-hand men, part of his “Brain Trust." Tugwell was put in charge of the R.A., and he saw that as a way to resettle people who were suffering from the Great Depression, both people who were being blown off their farms and people who were urban dwellers. He saw land that was outside of major metropolitan areas as a new frontier to build suburban resettlements.

These three towns, in particular, had a special designation as “Garden Cities." Tugwell looked to the past and he was inspired by a British urban reformer named Sir Ebenezer Howard. Howard was appalled by the brutal overcrowding of London, and he believed the solution to that problem was to decentralize cities and form new communities outside the big metropolitan areas. These new cities were meant to be both the best of the town and the best of the country, combining the social advantages of living in a community with the fresh air and green spaces of the country.

Can you tell more about your process of photographing the book?

I’ve been to each city at least three or four times over a span of maybe three or four years. It was out of the generosity of the residents that I was able to walk around and express my curiosity. I was working closely with the historical societies in each town, who connected me with people who were also interested in what I was doing. I was using a 4x5 camera, which is a large-format view camera. It's the type of camera that you usually have to use with a tripod and go under a dark cloth, so the camera itself was a conversation piece.

Why did you decide to use the 4x5 camera?

I love that camera—it uses 4x5 sheet film, so it’s not on a roll. The negative is 4 inches by 5 inches—a big negative with a lot of detail that makes beautiful prints. And you can correct perspective by tilting the lens. A lot of architectural photographers will use a 4x5 because it captures so much detail.

It’s portable enough that I can travel with it but also burdensome in the sense that it requires a lot of time to set up and it slows me down, so I have to be deliberate about what I’m photographing. [When I take a picture], I have to have already set up the tripod, loaded the film, and carefully framed the photo.

You get a sense of that in how still the photos in the book are—there aren’t any action shots. That deliberateness is why I chose to use [the 4x5 camera].

Why do you think it’s important to preserve these places and tell their story?

It is such an interesting slice of history as far as what American suburbs have become. I know that sprawl is a thing we’ve kind of accepted, but it means we’re commuting a long time. Sprawl means that we’re not necessarily walking. I think that if we looked back at these communities, there’s a lot of lessons to be learned.

Today’s urban planners look back to [garden cities] in England that were formed in the early 20^th century, but Greenbelt Towns are a really great case study, not just because of the types of housing, but also how real person-to-person communities were formed because of the towns. The planners had both the architectural fabric and the social fabric in mind while they were planning these places.

I think it’s a real model for how a nation should think about themselves. I know that these plans of egalitarianism and cooperation may seem to go against the principles of rugged individualism and capitalism, but these towns were built as a remedy to the Great Depression, both socially and architecturally.

I hope that we don’t have to go through another Great Depression to have these solutions come up again. I hope we can see each other as neighbors and fellow citizens instead of just competition.