Editor’s Note: This is the second of two reflections by Digital Documentation Fellows of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. All three of the fellows are architecture students at three partner Historically Black Colleges and Universities; the fellows spent six weeks working with Existing Conditions, the National Park Service—including their Heritage Documentation Programs—and the National Trust to understand preservation and utilize point-cloud data to document a historic home in New York City. This program is a partnership between HOPE Crew and the African American Cultural Heritage Action Fund.

I was first exposed to the field of historic preservation through the elective Historic Preservation 1 class at Tuskegee University, which I took as an architecture student. At that time, I realized that historic preservation is not often discussed in architecture school, and the few times the field is brought up, it is talked about as if it is something entirely different from architecture—which is far from reality. This was clear in this course where I heard from many historic preservation professionals about their day-to-day tasks, and noticed a disconnect between the architecture work and preservation, while also realizing the same disconnect existed for the field of architecture as well.

Going through the Digital Documentation Fellowship, I saw many parallels that helped me connect architecture and historic preservation, particularly around the use of technology and the importance of research.

Technology

One of the very first parallels I noticed was that the technology used in historic preservation is also widely used in the field of architecture. Working with Existing Conditions—the company doing the scanning at the historic home—I saw how powerful a tool like a laser scanner can be for both preservationists and architects.

For example, we were able to identify the original architect of the historic brownstone and identify the house as being of the Italianate style, which was typical of the rowhouses in Harlem at the time. Through our research, we were able to find the dimensions of the house before we were able to access the scan data. In my opinion, the most important research conducted uncovered information around why this house was so historic and worthy of preservation.

Meanwhile, in the field of architecture, the research done for a project is not about looking for what makes the project special but what will make the project special. The research done for an architecture project is what determines how well a build fits into its surrounding area, how to get the most out of the building, and how comfortable the end-user is using the building. Similarly, it is important to know the history of a building being preserved because the more you know about a property, the easier it is to craft a narrative around why it is important and what stories the property holds.