Section 106 Stories
Since the enactment of NHPA 60 years ago, Section 106 has been the foundational requirement for federal agencies to “take into account” the effects of their actions on historic properties and places, enabling public participation and comment in the process, empowering state and local governments and tribal communities to have a voice in the process, and often improving the project and enhancing the outcome. Read these stories to learn more about the Section 106 process and the positive impact it has.
-
Section 106 Under Threat Black Hawk Bridge over the Mississippi River -
Section 106 Under Threat Gordon Drive Viaduct and Bacon Creek Conduit Reconstruction -
Section 106 Under Threat James Island Connector -
Section 106 Under Threat Charleston Place -
Section 106 Under Threat Indian Creek Bridge/Bertram Bridge -
Section 106 Under Threat U.S. 75 Reconstruction in Hinton -
Section 106 Under Threat Howard-Ralston Eucalyptus Tree Rows -
Section 106 Under Threat Louisiana Avenue Firehouse -
Section 106 Under Threat U.S. Pavilion and Confluence Theater in Hemisfair Park -
Section 106 Under Threat The Past, Present, and Future of the National Historic Preservation Act -
Section 106 Under Threat Old Woman Truss Bridge & Berry House -
Section 106 Under Threat Find Your Section 106 Success Story
1 - 12 of 47 stories
Senate Bill S. 5653 would limit a process that considers how federal projects affect historic places and make community consultation optional for many projects. Urge your senators to oppose the bill as written and demand meaningful changes to its provisions.
Send Letters